LinkFromBlog

Link from blog is a unique and very good opportunity for both advertiser and blogger to get more traffic and earn revenue. Try it for free.

Monday 24 June 2013

Knowing The Arguments Against Evolution

By Lana Bray


Evolution is a change that is ongoing. It is an extraordinary process that has for a long time been strongly supported by scientific establishment despite the fact that they do not have any scientific evidence. It is believed that macroevolution still takes place. This is a process where organisms change from one type to another. There is no particular proof by evolutionists that the process of evolution will, is or had taken place. Numbers of arguments against evolution have emerged.

Firstly, evolution lacks a case. There is no individual who has seen it happen. This process should be a continuous one and if it were real, observations of several transitional forms could be made. What we observe instead are different types of animals and plants of varied types among each kind. These types are noted to have clear gaps between them. This variation is microevolution. Horizontal changes are said to occur often, but in real sense these vertical changes are not true.

Notifications had been made that changes did not actually take place in the past years. Evolutionists however tend to disagree with this. According to them, this process is very slow that it is almost impossible to notice it. Their major concern has been fossils to prove this. Nonetheless, the structural formula of these fossils do not show any form of change as evidence to development.

Evolution history comprises of progression of non-life to life, invertebrates to vertebrates and ape to man. The history at no point mentions the intermediaries involved. All of these have missing links in the fossil records and present world. According to researchers, the formation of nucleic acids or proteins is not possible them complementing each other with regards to origin of life. As a result, life does not originate from chemical reactions thereof.

Other evolutionists have totally committed to change. According to them, ribonucleic acid could have been the first to come. Nonetheless, it is still unclear of the rise of these acids. Hypothesis done by investigators propose that life cannot be naturalistically arisen. Scientists disapproved of this when they tried to make life in a test tube by mixing different gases. Many questions have been posed towards the progress of such.

No clue is given concerning organisms that are one celled and their evolution. It is not clear how they evolved from primordial world to the Cambrian period complex invertebrates that are vast and multi celled. This was the most puzzling and remarkable event in life history.

There is also no full explanation of creatures considered to be invertebrates in the ancient ocean. It is not clear how the fish- the first vertebrate, out of exterior parts that were hard and end up having the same hard parts on their inside. The transition of these invertebrates to be backboned fish still remains a big hysterical theory.

Many theories have been brought by man. Evolutionists are still on the verge of making people believe these theories. However, other people come up with contradictory facts. They say there are many unclear circumstances concerned with change. Until the right evidence is found, arguments against evolution will still come up.




About the Author:



1 comment:

  1. I read that Post and got it fine and informative. Please share more like that...
    custom challenge coin

    ReplyDelete