The development of living things and the universe at large has been a center of conflict between religious people and scientists. Christians believe that God created everything in a six day period as denoted in Genesis within the bible. Scientists believe evolution took place. In this perspective, several arguments against evolution theories have been advanced to reject the general scientific view.
The idea of living things being evolved from non living things beats the logic. This assumption is not possible and there is no evidence to support such claims. For life to come into existence there has to be parents of different gender. The others are just theories with no sustaining evidence to support their claim. Most of them are word of mouth.
On the side of universe, they believe it formed on its own from deformed matter. The weight is thrown behind the force of gravity. The biblical version denotes otherwise where God spent six days to create everything and He rested on the seventh day. Just mere statements of unknown force called gravity are not sufficient enough to support these theories.
Such a view does not beat logic. For anything to be formed there has to be an outside intelligence to put everything in the best position as of today. Gravitational force is just a mere theory whose proof is not concrete to make it possible in formation of spherical planets and stars. Besides, if its existence has been since time in memorial, it should have diminished to lower levels as of today.
In other terms, change comes into existence from organized form to disorganized ones. The view of matter moving from disorganized to organized is not a reality in any way. With transition still in existence, diminishing of any kind is can be noted. As of such, deformation is being experienced as of today. This makes their theories not to hold any ground with mere speculations and no concrete evidence.
The aspect of metamorphosis on the other hand bears no weight. Here, the belief that human beings mutated into the present day appearance from animals is unrealistic. With mutations, the end results are a new generic material from the original matter; nothing different to the originals as these theories state. This concurs with that of deformed matter transforming to well form things only through the influence of cerebral capacity.
Others have their basis on cell division within the bodies of living things. This process is too slow. In addition to this, the new cell is simply a replica of the original matter. This beats logic of this theory where rampant division of cells could have brought about human beings.
With all these in place, arguments against evolution theories have turned to be more realistic. There is clarity and all the available pieces of evidence point to the existence of intellectual being who was organized in coming up with the entire creation. All these are therefore the works of God.
The idea of living things being evolved from non living things beats the logic. This assumption is not possible and there is no evidence to support such claims. For life to come into existence there has to be parents of different gender. The others are just theories with no sustaining evidence to support their claim. Most of them are word of mouth.
On the side of universe, they believe it formed on its own from deformed matter. The weight is thrown behind the force of gravity. The biblical version denotes otherwise where God spent six days to create everything and He rested on the seventh day. Just mere statements of unknown force called gravity are not sufficient enough to support these theories.
Such a view does not beat logic. For anything to be formed there has to be an outside intelligence to put everything in the best position as of today. Gravitational force is just a mere theory whose proof is not concrete to make it possible in formation of spherical planets and stars. Besides, if its existence has been since time in memorial, it should have diminished to lower levels as of today.
In other terms, change comes into existence from organized form to disorganized ones. The view of matter moving from disorganized to organized is not a reality in any way. With transition still in existence, diminishing of any kind is can be noted. As of such, deformation is being experienced as of today. This makes their theories not to hold any ground with mere speculations and no concrete evidence.
The aspect of metamorphosis on the other hand bears no weight. Here, the belief that human beings mutated into the present day appearance from animals is unrealistic. With mutations, the end results are a new generic material from the original matter; nothing different to the originals as these theories state. This concurs with that of deformed matter transforming to well form things only through the influence of cerebral capacity.
Others have their basis on cell division within the bodies of living things. This process is too slow. In addition to this, the new cell is simply a replica of the original matter. This beats logic of this theory where rampant division of cells could have brought about human beings.
With all these in place, arguments against evolution theories have turned to be more realistic. There is clarity and all the available pieces of evidence point to the existence of intellectual being who was organized in coming up with the entire creation. All these are therefore the works of God.
About the Author:
You can visit the website daywithoutyesterday.net for more helpful information about Probable Arguments Against Evolution Theories
No comments:
Post a Comment