How the whole universe came into being is still a mystery to many. Many theories have thus come up to try and explain how they were formed and why they are in their current positions. They are known as the theories of evolution, and mostly they are in opposition to the creation story in the bible. According to them, the universe was formed through natural means. However, there are number of arguments against evolution which have be put forward.
A number of the arguments are based on the fact that there are no witnesses to evolution. Most of these theories have therefore failed to provide evidence for the availability of transitional forms. If what they purport was true, then plants and animals would not have been differentiated. It is however difficult to see the process happening even at the present times.
Various experiments have been carried out on fruit flies to try and see if new species can be produced from them. The fruits in this case are characterized by a rapid rate of reproduction. However, the tests which were meant to come up with a new species through mutation failed, of which it would have been possible if the theories of evolution were true.
There have been arguments against the possibility of meteoritic dust settling on the moon. The dust is known to settle on the earth and moon continuously and would have therefore piled up many feet in the millions of years that are said to have passed. This had even caused a worry during the launch of the first lunar ship to the moon as the astronauts thought it would have sunk many feet into the dust. However, when the sheep landed not more than an inch of the dust is what was found. This therefore resulted to the belief of a young moon and earth.
The magnetism of the earth keeps on reducing with time. This is to mean that at some point it must have been very strong like that of magnetic stars. However, the probability of this being the case is very low.
According to evolutionists, the magnetic fields of the earth are as a result electric fields found within it. If this was the case thousands of years ago, then the earth would not have been in existence today due to the large amounts of heat that would have been generated. It would have therefore been dissolved in the end.
The theory of punctuated equilibria seems to have its flaws. Even some of the evolutionists disagree by themselves. It was developed in order to try and answer the questions arising with geological records as there were no transitional fossils found. According to the theory, birds would have given birth to mammals, i. E. One species arising from another.
The circumstances under which the theory of punctuated equilibria would have occurred are just too minimal and the probability is even low. This and other evidences make up the arguments against evolution. Most of those arguing against the theories believe in the possibility of creation taking place.
A number of the arguments are based on the fact that there are no witnesses to evolution. Most of these theories have therefore failed to provide evidence for the availability of transitional forms. If what they purport was true, then plants and animals would not have been differentiated. It is however difficult to see the process happening even at the present times.
Various experiments have been carried out on fruit flies to try and see if new species can be produced from them. The fruits in this case are characterized by a rapid rate of reproduction. However, the tests which were meant to come up with a new species through mutation failed, of which it would have been possible if the theories of evolution were true.
There have been arguments against the possibility of meteoritic dust settling on the moon. The dust is known to settle on the earth and moon continuously and would have therefore piled up many feet in the millions of years that are said to have passed. This had even caused a worry during the launch of the first lunar ship to the moon as the astronauts thought it would have sunk many feet into the dust. However, when the sheep landed not more than an inch of the dust is what was found. This therefore resulted to the belief of a young moon and earth.
The magnetism of the earth keeps on reducing with time. This is to mean that at some point it must have been very strong like that of magnetic stars. However, the probability of this being the case is very low.
According to evolutionists, the magnetic fields of the earth are as a result electric fields found within it. If this was the case thousands of years ago, then the earth would not have been in existence today due to the large amounts of heat that would have been generated. It would have therefore been dissolved in the end.
The theory of punctuated equilibria seems to have its flaws. Even some of the evolutionists disagree by themselves. It was developed in order to try and answer the questions arising with geological records as there were no transitional fossils found. According to the theory, birds would have given birth to mammals, i. E. One species arising from another.
The circumstances under which the theory of punctuated equilibria would have occurred are just too minimal and the probability is even low. This and other evidences make up the arguments against evolution. Most of those arguing against the theories believe in the possibility of creation taking place.
About the Author:
The following online page daywithoutyesterday.net is one of the most reliable sources of information that explains about arguments against evolution . Come and review the published posts by logging on to http://daywithoutyesterday.net immediately.
No comments:
Post a Comment